Christianity Today commits a deeply troubling gaffe
“A note
from the editors of Leadership Journal:
We should not have published this post,
and we deeply regret the decision to do so. The post, told from the
perspective of a sex offender, withheld from readers until the very end a
crucial piece of information: that the sexual misconduct being described
involved a minor under the youth pastor's care. Among other failings, this post
used language that implied consent and mutuality when in fact there can be no
question that in situations of such disproportionate power there is no such
thing as consent or mutuality.” - Marshall Shelley, editor, Leadership Journal (13 June 2014)
Several emotions overwhelmed me upon
reading the original “post” in Leadership
Journal referred to in the retraction above - curiosity…disbelief… anger…
anxiety - ultimately, sadness. Deep, deep sadness!
Exactly thirty years ago while a
student at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, I researched sexual abuse in
evangelical circles at a time when no religious groups whatsoever were giving
it any attention. According to an
article I’d encountered in the Chicago
Tribune, incidents of sexual abuse in religious circles were equal to if
not greater than that in society at large.
A seminary classmate advised me of
the prevalence of this sinister evil at a prominent evangelical denomination’s
school for missionary kids he’d attended while his parents were missionaries in
Africa. A survey I conducted of some three hundred evangelical churches across
the American mid-west revealed that, while 90% of pastors had encountered some
variation of this hideous monster in their careers, a similar percentage had no
idea what to do about it.
Today - three decades later - after
listening to countless stories of betrayal in this regard from both women and
men, I simply cannot adequately process what I read in the self-professed
leading journal of North American evangelicalism! In merely reading the opening
paragraphs by the anonymous writer, I detected the telltale signs of the
twisted rationale of the sexual abuser/predator.
While engaged in a prospering youth
ministry, his marriage was undergoing challenges and the pressures of ministry
were growing - yada, yada - a “texting” relationship with a girl in his youth
group eventually evolved into what the author presents at some length as a
mutual, consensual affair.
Several of us vehemently protested the
self-deception and naiveté of which the article reeked.
One would hope Bible-thumping
evangelicals might be leading the parade in sniffing out this kind of rot.
Evidently we are not. Little more than a year has elapsed since disgraced
pastor Jack Schaap of the First Baptist (mega)Church in Hammond, Indiana, was
sent to jail for sexual relationships with minors. News reports to date in 2014
include numerous stories of similar allegations, arrests, charges and
convictions of fundamentalist pastors across North America. I was nonplussed a
month ago in a lengthy conversation with a Canadian pastor whose denomination
has yet to implement any policy regarding sexual indiscretions among adults in
ministry let alone having anything on the books with respect to dealing with
the sexual abuse of children.
I serve on the board of an
international agency committed to educating and advocating those who will
listen concerning a heinous evil lurking among us that viscously discredits the
gospel of Christ. As much as I applaud the apology and retraction of Leadership Journal, that such an article
ever saw the light of day in the first place is intensely troubling.
I, for one, am beyond fed-up with
the preoccupation of evangelicals with preserving institutional and personal reputations
at the expense of protecting minors. Didn’t some philosopher named Millstone
once have something to say in that regard?